Re:Struggles with the Continuum
by xanderlewis on Monday November 27, 2023 @03:08PM
(#38437520)
> shouldn't a direct comment be addressing to the paper instead?
Perhaps, yes. I’m not sure what’s considered acceptable and it’s not as if I intended it to reach the ‘top’ (if it has?).
But shouldn't a direct comment be addressing to the paper instead? I might be wrong and am certainly not well versed in HN.
I am not disappointed in your comment per se, I'm disappointed that is the top comment. May be because replies to your comment got more upvote (again, not knowing HN well enough to understand this.) But if that's the case, that's more because of a controversial comment attracting more refutals than the comment itself being more relevant to the discussion.