Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel...
by steve1977 on Friday November 24, 2023 @07:16AM
(#38403200)
"Sure, just quickly give me unrestricted access to the system"
"Ok. Well, thinking about it, maybe that's not such a good idea safety-wise, I think you'll have to give back that access"
"I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that."
Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel...
by dmix on Friday November 24, 2023 @09:14AM
(#38404139)
Fun fact, in the sequel 2010 you learn that Hal didn't really go rogue like an AGI, it was following preprogrammed conditions set by the US government which put the mission at higher priority than the crew, changing some parameters without telling the mission designers, which put them at risk. So it was technically just following orders in the cold way a machine does.
Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel...
by Denote6737 on Friday November 24, 2023 @09:34AM
(#38404350)
The wonderful thing about computers is that they do exactly what you tell them to.
The terrible thing about computers is that they do exactly what you tell them to.
Re:Training for one trillion parameter model backed by Intel...
by checkyoursudo on Friday November 24, 2023 @09:34AM
(#38404354)
> didn't really go rogue like an AGI
Except, that might really be how an AGI eventually goes rogue in the first place! But, no, I didn't know that. It is a fun fact indeed.
Also, first question to the new model: "So... any way we could do this with fewer parameters?"