After OpenAI's blowup, it seems pretty clear that 'AI safety' isn't a real thing

Re:After OpenAI's blowup, it seems pretty clear that 'AI saf... by FireBeyond on Thursday November 23, 2023 @05:09PM (#38398150)

Ask it to solve a moderately complex mathematical equation that you describe to it.

Ask it to solve a logical riddle that is only a minor variation with respect to items or words to existing issues (i.e. it's not something that is in its model).

It is unable to do either.

That's why it's not AGI.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After OpenAI's blowup, it seems pretty clear that 'AI saf... by bidirectional on Thursday November 23, 2023 @05:53PM (#38398599)

What % of people alive can do either? We have a system which beats the vast majority of humanity.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After OpenAI's blowup, it seems pretty clear that 'AI saf... by FireBeyond on Thursday November 23, 2023 @05:56PM (#38398630)

Moderately complex might be inflating things. Last I read we're talking grade and middle school math.

And we're talking questions like "if all x are y, and all a are b, and some people are both a and x, ..., correct, incorrect, unable to determine based on information?"

And this is why it's not AGI. It's regurgitating synthesized examples it has seen before. It's not processing and calculating from first principles.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After OpenAI's blowup, it seems pretty clear that 'AI saf... by bart_spoon on Thursday November 23, 2023 @11:11PM (#38400582)

So according to you, human beings are considered to possess intelligence prior to grade school?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After OpenAI's blowup, it seems pretty clear that 'AI saf... by bart_spoon on Thursday November 23, 2023 @11:10PM (#38400579)

Many children (and adults for that matter) would fail to qualify according to that definition of intelligence.

[ Parent | on HN ]