News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sam Altman's ouster was precipitated by letter to board a... by TeMPOraL on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @08:11PM (#38387844)
Except this was entirely possible with API, and the dead stupid obvious thing to do, even as far back as OG ChatGPT (pre-GPT-4). Assistants don't seem to introduce anything new here, at least not anything one could trivially make with API access, a Python script, and a credit card.

So I don't thing it's this - otherwise someone would've done this long time ago and killed us all.

Also not like all the "value adds" for ChatGPT are in any way original or innovative - "plugins" / "agents" were something you could use months ago via alternative frontend like TypingMind, if you were willing to write some basic JavaScript and/or implement your own server-side actions for the LLM to invoke. So it can't be this.

Re:Sam Altman's ouster was precipitated by letter to board a... by wrycoder on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @09:17PM (#38388396)
What seemed to work at Google was to have the AIs chat with each other.
Re:Sam Altman's ouster was precipitated by letter to board a... by Tostino on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @10:12PM (#38388771)
I'd agree that what is available publicly isn't anything that hasn't been in wide discussion for an agent framework since maybe ~march/april of this year, and many people had just hacked together their own version with an agent/RAG pipeline and API to hide their requests behind.

I'm very sure anything revolutionary would have been more of a leap than deeply integrating a agent/RAG pipeline into the OpenAI API. They have the compute...