ironically, that’s too simplistic. Simplicity is only virtuous in an explanation if the explanation itself is not contradicted by reality. Unbound from reality, simplicity is dangerously seductive because it’s easy and wrong.

For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.

- H.L. Mencken

very glib (though true) - but do you have any evidence in this case as to what reality is? If so, could you please explain how the given statement is "contradicted by reality"?

I was just addressing the notion that the simplicity of the conspiracy theory was evidence of its veracity - it is not. If you're asking if I have evidence against the nonsensical conspiracy theory that third party praise given about a recently fired CEO can be construed as evidence of a secret ownership stake in the charity that fired him, I'm going to leave that to the judgement of the reader.

Discovered a while ago by Occam.[1]

1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

That’s not how Occam’s Razor works, though, as explained in your link.

Good to know.

no shit. tell me why the sky is blue.