Re:Sam Altman's been fired before. The polarizing past of Op...
by tristor on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @10:45AM
(#38380769)
I suggest you reread your comment then. You claimed the only reason people questioned their qualifications was sexism.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sam Altman's been fired before. The polarizing past of Op...
by Philpax on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @10:56AM
(#38380906)
They never said the word "only" or implied it.
Re:Sam Altman's been fired before. The polarizing past of Op...
by tristor on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @11:19AM
(#38381227)
They did not explicitly say it, it was definitely implied, since their entire comment was to claim that is was misogyny and sexism that were the motivations for commenters questioning these board members qualifications. I invite folks to actually look into qualifications of all of the board members, unless it's changed they're on the OpenAI website.
Re:Sam Altman's been fired before. The polarizing past of Op...
by Philpax on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @11:21AM
(#38381258)
> I think part of this
> There has been a lot of thinly veiled sexism
No, they didn't imply it, and they didn't claim it was the primary motivation. They just said it was a contributor. You are perceiving a stronger claim than they made.
Re:Sam Altman's been fired before. The polarizing past of Op...
by tristor on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @11:24AM
(#38381307)
It's literally the only claim they made. There were no alternatives, so of course it's perceived and implied to be the strongest claim.
They said what they said, trying to weasel out of it doesn't make the case.