Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and feuding

Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe... by marquisdepolis on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @11:04PM (#38374623)

In this instance, "Sam is trying to take over the Board on a flimsy basis" is an reasonable reason to remove him. Started leading discussions about whether she should be removed, is also very very far from actively working to remove her.

This is amateur hour and considering what happened she probably should have been removed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe... by jprete on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @11:35PM (#38374758)

Leading discussions on whether someone should be removed is literally actively working to remove them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe... by marquisdepolis on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @11:50PM (#38374851)

It's quite literally not. After she wrote that it would be silly if you didn't even have discussions considering this.

Actively working would require active efforts to make this happen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe... by lmm on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @01:54AM (#38375741)

What would those "active efforts" consist of beyond "leading discussions"? You have the discussion, you have the board vote, you're done, there's no ??? step.

[ Parent | on HN ]