Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by prospector1065 on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @10:03PM
(#38374220)
From her perspective, she does have a good reason. And in what way was publishing the paper "overruling" the employees of the for-profit company? The board of the non-profit is beholden to their charter first and foremost
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by danenania on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @11:32PM
(#38374743)
“From her perspective, she does have a good reason.”
Does she? In that case, perhaps she should tell someone what it is.
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by dkjaudyeqooe on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @02:08AM
(#38375874)
She told the board. Who else should she tell?
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by ben_w on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @06:19AM
(#38377763)
My limited understanding is that this was all that was strictly required, and would normally be sufficient.
Nevertheless, when a board decision explodes into international headline news as this one did, my gut feeling is it might possibly be a good idea to make a press release with more details.
But that's easy for me to say — I don't have the real insider information, and I wasn't in their shoes.