Re:River: A fast, robust job queue for Go and Postgres
by AtlasBarfed on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @06:45PM
(#38372302)
I thought the first rule of queues was never use a database as a queue.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:River: A fast, robust job queue for Go and Postgres
by 22c on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @08:30PM
(#38373391)
The "problem" is that a database as a queue doesn't infinitely scale, but nothing infinitely scales. If you're starting to reach the limits of Postgres-as-a-queue then you've either done something very wrong or very right to get to that point.
It's probably more correct to say that the engineering effort required to make a Postgres-as-a-queue scale horizontally is a lot more than the engineering effort required to make a dedicated queueing service scale horizontally. The trade-off is that you're typically going to have to start scaling horizontally much sooner with your dedicated queuing service than with a Postgres database.
The argument for Postgres-as-a-queue is that you might be able to get to market much quicker, which can be significantly more important than how well you can scale down the track.
Re:River: A fast, robust job queue for Go and Postgres
by AtlasBarfed on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @09:19AM
(#38379492)
I thought Kafka could relatively infinitely scale