News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stable Video Diffusion by coldtea on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @04:34PM (#38370567)
>For although I love SD and these video examples are great... It's a flawed method: they never get lighting correctly and there are many incoherent things just about everywhere. Any 3D artist or photographer can immediately spot that.

The question is whether the 99% of the audience would even care...

Re:Stable Video Diffusion by COAGULOPATH on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @11:47PM (#38374834)
Of course they would. The internet spent a solid month laughing at the Sonic the Hedgehog movie because Sonic had weird-looking teeth.
Re:Stable Video Diffusion by ekianjo on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @05:01AM (#38377223)
No they laughed at it because it looked awful in every single way
Re:Stable Video Diffusion by coldtea on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @06:47AM (#38377953)
Since that movie did well and spawned 2 sequels, the real conclusion is that the viewers didn't really care.

As for "the internet", there will always some small part of it which will obsess and/or laught over anything, doesn't mean they represent anything significant - not even when they're vocal.

Re:Stable Video Diffusion by PawgerZ on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @09:11AM (#38379374)
Viewers did care: the teeth got changed before the movie was released. And, I don't know if you missed it, but it wasn't just one niche of the internet commenting on his teeth. The "outrage" went mainstream; even dentists were making hit-pieces on Sonic's teeth. I'm not gonna lie, it was amazing marketing for the movie, intentional or not.