Journalists who work with whistleblowers typically validate that the person in question is reliable and is who they say they are. How do we know this was written by former employees?

This, honestly, feels like it ought to be removed. It is not a reliable letter without names or some kind of verification, just a random post on a website.

It's as valid as all the other articles with assumptions what is happening at OpenAI.

It a starting point for others for digging deeper and either prove or disprove the claims