News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No evidence screen time is negative for child cognitive d... by zer00eyz on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @12:00PM (#38366371)
As someone who doesn't abuse the phone, and mostly works on a computer I have this same issue. It is rare for me to be able to enjoy a movie.

Im of the opinion that the quality of content is hot garbage on a good day and actual entertainment is rare now.

Re:No evidence screen time is negative for child cognitive d... by hotpotamus on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @12:37PM (#38366916)
I feel this as well (which isn't to say it's true I suppose) about most content, but yes; especially modern movies. It seems like it's nearly all formulaic drivel made to satisfy some algorithm. Of course, it's also possible that's just me getting older - I can imagine some old man making a similar complaint. But I can't help but think there really is something going on.

I recently watched Willem Dafoe in "Inside" and while it's not really a cinematic experience that could be called pleasant, I was actually satisfied at the end of it because it actually felt creative.

Re:No evidence screen time is negative for child cognitive d... by seec on Thursday November 23, 2023 @06:24AM (#38391633)
Yeah, I think that's pretty much it. We now have way more content to choose from but the problem now is to be able to select what is worthwhile. They call it attention economy and that's pretty much why. You have limited attention, if you use it on some random crap, you can't use it for something better (that you didn't notice or wasn't as easily accessible).

A friend of mine gets pissed off when I fall asleep in front of half the movies, he asks me to watch, but the reality is that those movies are bargain bin low quality comedies (or worse, documentaries) and its better use of my time to sleep than bother with it. It's actually one of my sleeping strategies, to empty my brain of thoughts, so...

I don't think there is a major problem with attention, neither in children or adults; it's just that it's a lot harder to sort through what is worth your attention and after some willpower is spent to choose something it doesn't get overthrown because of the psychology of commitment. But it is not worth paying attention, so people use whatever is around them to not completely waste time.

In my opinion inattentive children in classrooms has a lot more to do with teachers being bad and lack of physical activities than a problem with the kids. But teachers are politically untouchable nowadays and you can't ask them to actually be competitive or get fired. The pay is also progressive and equal regardless of actual performance, so you get terrible people who cannot keep kids' attention because they suck; but then we blame the kids. Sure.