Re:Increasing QUIC and UDP Throughput over Tailscale
by thfuran on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @08:20AM
(#38363256)
It'd require sensible regulation, so the Republicans simply won't stand for it, and it's not one of the Democrats' main issues, so they couldn't be bothered.
Re:Increasing QUIC and UDP Throughput over Tailscale
by halJordan on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @04:11PM
(#38370195)
The problem is how satisfied people are when they get to just blame the other side and not bother with any further thought. As long as people like you reward that mentality then it will never be fixed.
Re:Increasing QUIC and UDP Throughput over Tailscale
by thfuran on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @04:28PM
(#38370462)
Yes, it must be me to blame, not the bad faith actors in office. Would you like to collect the two cent payment I offer for exposure to my wrongthink now or later?
Re:Increasing QUIC and UDP Throughput over Tailscale
by sofixa on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @08:56AM
(#38363624)
> Separating the last mile infrastructure from the ISP can make it possible to have natural monopoly for everybody's last miles, but widespread competition for ISPs. That might be really hard to pull off in the US but I think it'd be worth striving for.
Or even better, the model we have in France. The last mile is a monopoly for a limited time only (2-3 years). So if you build a connection to some place that didn't have one, you can profit off exclusivity for some time, and are incentivised to be good to the consumers because they can switch, but will probably ony do so if you're shit/too expensive.
Separating the last mile infrastructure from the ISP can make it possible to have natural monopoly for everybody's last miles, but widespread competition for ISPs. That might be really hard to pull off in the US but I think it'd be worth striving for.