Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by VectorLock on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @02:43AM
(#38360598)
It feels like Altman started the whole non-profit thing so he could attract top researchers with altruistic sentiment for sub-FANAAG wages. So the whole "Altman wasn't candid" thing seems to track.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by saagarjha on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @03:03AM
(#38360756)
Ok, but the wages were excellent (assuming that the equity panned out, which it seemed very likely it would until last week).
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by margorczynski on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @07:34AM
(#38362778)
So it is possible a lot of those people against Altman being outed are like that because they know the equity they hold will take a dump?
I'm not saying they are hypocrites or bad people because of it, just wondering if that might be a factor also.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by VectorLock on Friday November 24, 2023 @12:24AM
(#38400874)
I'd say the 650 out of the 700 people who signed it were those who joined later for the money, and not early for the non-profit's mission.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by VectorLock on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @03:22AM
(#38376499)
Excellent but not FANAANG astronomical.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by mcpackieh on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @09:23AM
(#38363973)
Reminds me of a certain rocket company that specializes in launching large satellite constellations that attracts top talent with altruistic sentiment about saving humanity from extinction.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by VectorLock on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @03:23AM
(#38376504)
No surprise that Musk co-founded OpenAI then.
Seems to be pretty much his MO across the board.