After Boeing declines to pay up, ransomware group leaks 45 GB of data

Re:After Boeing declines to pay up, ransomware group leaks 4... by verdverm on Monday November 20, 2023 @10:08PM (#38358542)

Given how much the max family and 8 are flown, I don't think this holds up.

Some searching says...

1. >1000 flights per day for the family

2. 2 US carriers accounting for more than 200 Max 8 per day

So one would have to get to 20,000 flights after two crashes to get 2 nines. We're well past that threshold

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After Boeing declines to pay up, ransomware group leaks 4... by Xixi on Monday November 20, 2023 @11:18PM (#38359164)

From inception to the second crash, numbers were abysmal. The 737 Max was crashing at a rate of about one per hundred thousand flights, two order of magnitude worse that the 737 NG (one fatal crash per 10 million flights).

Said differently, the Max 8 was working safely 99.999% of the time, while the 737 NG was working safely 99.99999% of the time. An order of magnitude better than 99.99%, but two orders of magnitude worse than expected...

It is certainly a lot safer now. Hopefully even better than the 737 NG.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After Boeing declines to pay up, ransomware group leaks 4... by throwaway318 on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @12:22AM (#38359692)

The probability of not having a crash after 20,000 flights, with 99.99% chance per flight, assuming no serial correlation, is 13%.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:After Boeing declines to pay up, ransomware group leaks 4... by verdverm on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @04:54AM (#38361589)

Yes, there is a better, more accurate method than my napkin math, which was only to provide a baseline most could understand to see we are well beyond the two nines

[ Parent | on HN ]