Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by ben_w on Monday November 20, 2023 @07:23PM
(#38357039)
My current ill-informed guess is blackmail against the board with a demand to stop further development. Obviously I have no evidence, but it fits marginally less poorly than the other random guesses people are making.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by kmlevitt on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:55PM
(#38357857)
The best theory I’ve seen is that D’Angelo is just angry because Altman scooped his AI Chatbot company Poe on dev day without informing him first:
https://twitter.com/scottastevenson/status/17267310228620087...
if this was the case it would explain why he can’t give the real reason for the firing: because saying it out loud would put him in severe legal Jeopardy.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by jacquesm on Monday November 20, 2023 @10:10PM
(#38358555)
I don't think it matters anymore. He's between a rock and a hard place: if the others followed him without knowing the real reason he's got two more enemies on the board who are likely talking to their own lawyers by now. If he spills it he's screwed immediately, if he doesn't he's screwed in the longer term. So for his sake I hope there are some nice time-stamped minutes that detail exactly what caused them to act like they did and it had better be good.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by kmlevitt on Monday November 20, 2023 @11:16PM
(#38359144)
That’s another thing though: they were apparently holding secret meetings plotting all this without informing Greg or Sam, which is apparently against their own regulations. So if that’s the case it’s unlikely there is any formal record of what was discussed. And perhaps by design.