Re:OpenAI staff threaten to quit unless board resigns
by financltravsty on Monday November 20, 2023 @11:38AM
(#38350219)
Everyone always forgets there's two parts to Hanlon's razor:
> Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity (1), but don't rule out malice. (2)
Re:OpenAI staff threaten to quit unless board resigns
by freedomben on Monday November 20, 2023 @02:24PM
(#38353102)
I don't actually think (2) is part of the razor[1]. If it is, then it doesn't make sense because (1) is an absolute (i.e. "never") which is always evaluated boolean "true", therefore statement (2) is never actually executed and is dead code.
Nevertheless I agree with you and think (2) is wise to always keep in mind. I love Hanlon's Razor but people definitely should take it literally as written and/or as law.
also known as "never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence", which to my gut sounds at least as likely as a cui bono explanation tbh (which is not to be seen as an endorsement of the view that cui bono = conspiracy...)