If I included fuel it would be a much scarier number.
Based on its apparent condition and ongoing expenses, I don’t expect this number to increase much. I have a feeling Uber’s numbers are wrong, or they’re including fuel costs.
That’s what this article is about?
It typically takes 5-10 minutes for an Uber to arrive at my door. Not to mention the few times where the driver has cancelled the ride, and left me waiting for a new one to be assigned. Especially troublesome when you are relying upon this service to make a hard deadline at the airport.
Pretending that fuel isn’t part of the equation doesn’t help though.
It looks like with fuel considered, my yearly cost rises to about $12k.
A big part of the difference could be that Uber is including in its number the depreciation in the value of the vehicle, which most people don’t consider when asked what the cost of ownership in a given year is. Most people answer with insurance + fuel + maintenance and ignore non-cash costs.
I suspect Uber statisticians did the latter. I also suspect that method is more accurate than people entrenched in car culture estimating their own expenses.
I also live in NZ, did you read the CBA report on our feebate scheme a while back?
It concluded the policy had a net economic benefit due to correcting consumer's failing to take into account the cost of fuel in making ICE/hybrid/PEV purchasing decisions.
Amusingly, in America, I purchased my used Honda for less than $16k.
(I drive a 2009 Hyundai while I wait for a reasonably-priced EV to become available.)
I am in New Zealand. Our car fleet is old (median car is something like 15 years old, but don’t quote me on that).
There is no chance the average New Zealander is spending even close to Uber’ estimate. Australians, I am told Australians have nicer cars than NZ but I really doubt Uber knows more about what the average Australian spends than they do.