News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Victor Mono Typeface by karmakaze on Sunday November 19, 2023 @09:38AM (#38333000)
Sorry but that script 'true' doesn't belong in a programming font--monospace only.
Re:Victor Mono Typeface by eropple on Sunday November 19, 2023 @09:47AM (#38333101)
Monospace/proportional is orthogonal to roman/italic; that italic 'true' is still monospace. They do have an oblique variant instead of italic, though.
Re:Victor Mono Typeface by karmakaze on Sunday November 19, 2023 @10:07AM (#38333283)
Yes, I meant it's a 'monospace (font) only' and not a programming font.
Re:Victor Mono Typeface by rubjo on Sunday November 19, 2023 @11:39AM (#38334320)
I have Booleans in italic (blasphemy!) :D and find it is immediately recognizeable that they are spelt correctly when the editor formats them that way. YMMV.
Re:Victor Mono Typeface by karmakaze on Sunday November 19, 2023 @12:01PM (#38334638)
I have no problem with italics. What I object to is one that appears cursive (script) and calls itself a programming font.