News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Greg (2017) by chris_wot on Sunday November 19, 2023 @12:23AM (#38329359)
I assumed that the responses were something like "hey, not sure I'll need to get back to you" (and then he researches/investigates after re-prioritizing other work and gets back to him).
Re:Greg (2017) by snowwrestler on Sunday November 19, 2023 @01:08PM (#38335640)
Yes, that is the way to do it. Don’t leave the sender wondering. Immediately confirm that you read the email and are prioritizing a substantive response.