News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on /story/38321947. Parent comment

Re: by wolverine876 on Saturday November 18, 2023 @02:37PM (#38323495)
That differs from every credible source I've read for many years. Do you happen to have any credible sources that support that depiction?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by wolverine876 on Saturday November 18, 2023 @03:04PM (#38323770)
Thanks. Not your job to provide them, but Wikipedia, especially about a white-hot topic, is not reliable in my book. I will keep an eye out.

Still, if you want to persuade people of extraordinary claims, you'll of course need very strong evidence.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by prmph on Saturday November 18, 2023 @03:57PM (#38324336)
There are references for the HDI figures. You really think Wikipedia is cooking HDI figures?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by wolverine876 on Saturday November 18, 2023 @10:59PM (#38328740)
An editor could be, but regardless, Wikipedia has many risks, especially in this scenario.
[ Parent | on HN ]