News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Practical nil panic detection for Go by Philpax on Saturday November 18, 2023 @01:38PM (#38322869)
> Do not forget that in some scenarios using unwrap is totally fine if a panic is acceptable.

Looking through the first few pages, most of these panics are easy to audit, and are infallible or in contexts where it doesn't matter (internal tooling, etc). That's a pretty stark difference to every single reference being a potential landmine.

Re:Practical nil panic detection for Go by foldr on Saturday November 18, 2023 @02:13PM (#38323215)
Yes, you are probably less likely to get a panic caused by a nil reference in Rust than in Go. My point is that the equivalent software written in Rust (or most other languages with option types) would probably have had at least some of these very same bugs.