Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by actondev on Thursday November 16, 2023 @11:41AM
(#38291765)
And this is why we can't have nice things.
Now that we will/are starting to have AI-created content, and visits from bots, comments from AI bots.. we need some new metric I reckon
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by klyrs on Thursday November 16, 2023 @11:49AM
(#38291892)
I propose: time spent offline.
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by sonicanatidae on Thursday November 16, 2023 @12:26PM
(#38292501)
What is this, "offline", of which you speak?!?!
You mean like wifi?
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by kibwen on Thursday November 16, 2023 @01:01PM
(#38293024)
I think "offline" means mocking your ethernet driver to produce packets confabulated by a locally-running copy of ChatGPT, so you can doomscroll the internet even without needing to pay Comcast for the privilege.
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by sonicanatidae on Friday November 17, 2023 @09:01AM
(#38303637)
Ahhh.. whew... for a microsecond, I was thinking they meant the dark ages.
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by h2odragon on Thursday November 16, 2023 @01:10PM
(#38293162)
Naw, theres this great new game; "nonvirtual reality"
its kinda expensive and dangerously addictive
the resolution and refresh rate are amazing
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by sonicanatidae on Friday November 17, 2023 @09:32AM
(#38304106)
But how do the packets get to the other computers? Are you trailing a cord on a spool?
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by h2odragon on Friday November 17, 2023 @10:20AM
(#38304755)
nah its like WiFi but lower frequency. "sound"
Re:Bad Bots Account for 73% of Internet Traffic: Analysis
by sonicanatidae on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @01:22PM
(#38367746)
That sounds like a situation ripe for modulation to increase data throughput.