Re:13 days before the first eIDAS vote, still no public text
by lock-the-spock on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @04:52AM
(#38275006)
Thank you. I think the criticism is really just about the certificate requirement. I just don't see what other part of eidas could be considered to MitM anyone. But of course only the author would know for sure what they meant.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:13 days before the first eIDAS vote, still no public text
by Vinnl on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @07:26AM
(#38275932)
That is indeed why they keep referring to Article 45 - the specific article of concern. If that was removed, presumably this new version of eIDAS would be fine. (And an existing version has already been in effect for a while, if I understand correctly.)