Re:U.S. Reenters the Nuclear Fuel Game
by mrweasel on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @04:17AM
(#38274790)
Keeping existing plants running is the sensible approach in my mind. We can't build new nuclear power to reduce CO2 emission, it's much to late for that. We want drastic reductions in 5 - 6 years, the first nuclear power plant won't be ready for another 10, 15, 20 years. If we wanted to go nuclear we should have started in 2000. Right now we start reducing consumption, build wind turbines like crazy and close the coal and oil fired power plants first, then gas and nuclear last.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Reenters the Nuclear Fuel Game
by throwaway4aday on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @10:14AM
(#38277490)
Speak for your own country because others have built huge numbers of nuclear plants with an average of 4 years for completion. The anti-nuke sentiment from the environmental movement is the only reason the U.S. isn't entirely energy independent. That attitude has probably done more to contribute to climate change than anything else, ironically.