Re:ARRL Hails FCC Action to Remove Symbol Rate Restrictions
by donw on Tuesday November 14, 2023 @11:31PM
(#38273374)
I would argue that the behavior of hams discourages interaction between hams.
Re:ARRL Hails FCC Action to Remove Symbol Rate Restrictions
by lrvick on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @01:35AM
(#38273935)
What open hardware can legally do any useful (open source, auditable, and secure) encrypted voice communication at long distance via ISM?
Re:ARRL Hails FCC Action to Remove Symbol Rate Restrictions
by rsync on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @02:02PM
(#38280868)
Yes, please - I would like to see examples of the hardware stack that enables this use-case.
Thanks.
Re:ARRL Hails FCC Action to Remove Symbol Rate Restrictions
by jjjjmoney on Thursday November 16, 2023 @01:11AM
(#38286276)
I’m trying to dig up the M17 messages on the chipsets, but until then - WiFi is incredibly popular and operates on ISM bands. Same with LoraWan, and I have seen some proprietary 900Mhz mesh devices (I think called Milo(?)).
The M17 project found some low cost transceivers that operate on a pretty low level, and I think those would be relevant for future development on ISM for people wanting to use encryption.
Re:ARRL Hails FCC Action to Remove Symbol Rate Restrictions
by Johnythree on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @07:37PM
(#38284450)
Talk to your radio supplier, there are many encryption devices routinely used on VHF and UHF.
Of course encryption is not impossible on HF, just a bit more difficult.
Whatever, both commercial and military uses are using encryption on HF.
Re:ARRL Hails FCC Action to Remove Symbol Rate Restrictions
by lrvick on Thursday November 16, 2023 @07:10PM
(#38297498)
Commercial and military use encryption with well known backdoors on HF, using bands only they are licensed to use with proprietary hardware.
https://www.wired.com/story/tetra-radio-encryption-backdoor/
This is why proprietary solutions are non-starters.
Civilians deserve real encryption they can control with provable privacy.
Re:ARRL Hails FCC Action to Remove Symbol Rate Restrictions
by apple4ever on Monday November 20, 2023 @04:55PM
(#38355457)
Then we restrict portions of the bands to encryption, just like voice, Morse code, etc.
FHSS is pretty trivial to “decrypt” these days with an SDR.
While you’re not wrong about experimentation, I feel like ham radio should be focused more on the radio side of things rather than encryption implementations. Implementing the hardware and software encoding/decoding is the hard/fun part (at least to me). Encryption should come as a piece of cake after than if you can achieve a given bitrate.
And again - there already are bands that allow encryption. A couple hundred bucks and a few applications, and you’re free to go nuts.
And I completely forgot, but ISM bands do allow encryption, are free, and there is plenty of hardware out there readily available.