Re:The First Commercial Carbon-Sucking Facility in the US Op...
by blencdr on Sunday November 12, 2023 @02:24AM
(#38238129)
Wouldn't it be simpler to plant trees instead of using energy to capture carbon? To absorb 1000 tons of CO2 a year, you'd need roughly 200 acres of land, which seems more feasible.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.