News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by tedunangst on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @01:54PM (#3823461)
Fun fact: open source projects that host their own repos are categorically not awesome.
Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by victork2 on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:01PM (#3823495)
Fun fact #2:

In the top 9 most awesome Open Source projects in the world 6 out of 9 are ruby projects. Linux or Apache projects are not in the lists. Yep, seems about right... (I am sarcastic of course)

Plus, but it may only be me, rating open source projects by "awesomeness" is a gross misunderstanding of the nature of Open Source and the contribution that everybody can bring into this world.

Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by tzs on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @03:28PM (#3823945)
> In the top 9 most awesome Open Source projects in the world 6 out of 9 are ruby projects

Why did you pick the top 9?

Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by vramosp on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @03:34PM (#3823968)
We didn't pick them, it's the result of the sum of its contributors' DevScore. And we calculate the DevScore taking into account your contributions, the reputation of your projects and the reputation of the people you work with.
Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by tzs on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @04:54PM (#3824377)
I'm sorry, my question was ambiguous. I'm not asking how the list was generated. I'm asking how the person my comment was in reply to, who criticized it as being too ruby heavy, decided to base his criticism on the top 9 elements of the top 10 list instead of basing it on all 10.

The natural sample would have been all 10 items in the top 10. Cutting it off at the rather weird 9, especially considering that the 10th is not a ruby item, gives the appearance that he massaged the data to support his position.

Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by pauldino on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @05:11PM (#3824450)
The screen grab in the blog post only shows the top 9.
Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by vramosp on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:14PM (#3823558)
They are! The ones that are self hosted are in the leader board too. (And if there's not, you can suggest it and add it).
Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by tedunangst on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:36PM (#3823682)
The idea that it's necessary for an open source project to fill out a form and register with the awesome authority is... weird.

I understand what you're trying to do, but I think this (and similar efforts) are a net negative. Sorry.

Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by charlieok on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:17PM (#3823584)
What's wrong with hosting your own repo?
Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by krobertson on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:24PM (#3823626)
The service only pulls info from hosting services like Github/Bitbucket. If you host your own, you can't show up on their "awesome" list.
Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by vramosp on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:57PM (#3823802)
The service pulls info from self hosted repos as well as long as they use git, svn, cvs or hg.

In addition, we actively track projects from forges like Github, Bitbucket, Apache, Java.net, Google Code, etc.

Re:Open Source projects ranked by awesomeness by charlieok on Tuesday April 10, 2012 @02:35PM (#3823678)
Ah, gotcha :)