News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Switching to Elixir by peoplefromibiza on Friday November 10, 2023 @04:39AM (#38216898)
> I really don't like not knowing what format data is in.

Which is orthogonal to what the type is

The shape of the data is much simpler to handle in Elixir than in, to name one, Java.

> a vast number of possible errors caught at compile time

if it's a vast number, usually it's because either:

- you're not familiar with the code base (and you'll make a vast number of other kinds of errors)

- you're making a huge refactory and you're used to rely on a compile-driven workflow, but there are so many alternative ways to handle them

> things go wrong in production

the usual wisdom applies here: static typing does not replace input validation, be it user provided data or function parameters

Re:Switching to Elixir by solidninja on Friday November 10, 2023 @07:01AM (#38217842)
Static typing can replace input validation though - if you make illegal states unrepresentable. That way you bake validation into your types e.g. using refined types: https://blog.rockthejvm.com/refined-types/ in Scala