While the US regulates strikes and minimum wages by law, it is in Sweden regulated by collective agreements. So, Tesla is choosing to allow these strikes against them by not signing it. They're the ones to blame for any action that stems from this decision, no-one else.
Can you imagine the outrage that would come from a Swedish company coming to the US, trying to change fundamental mechanics of the system there without the support of its citizens? Why shouldn't this scenario result in the same outrage and resistance here in Sweden?
The solution is simple, sign the agreement - as is custom here in Sweden. If they can't conform to Swedish customs then they are perfectly free to leave.
Have the workers looted Tesla's plants? Are they burning down Tesla cars in transit?
No?
Then fuck off. Workers are simply negotiating for a fair price for THEIR private property - the labor services that they provide.
And why is that bad? You've just described a negotiation between two private parties. In any negotiation, parties try to get their counterparty to do something with their property.
Workers are negotiating with the company about the sale of private property that they possess (aka "labor services"). Of course, workers can also organize together, it's simply an exercise in free speech.
Heck, it's as libertarian as it can be.
You see the goal of forcing union usage as a noble thing so you agree with these means. If the goal was one that you don't see as noble you'd definitely agree that it's very organized crime like.
> If the goal was one that you don't see as noble you'd definitely agree that it's very organized crime like.
Categorizing things as being criminal is a juvenile sort of thinking.