Re:Wikipedia Became the Last Good Place on the Internet
by wavemode on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @10:04AM
(#38191359)
Even assuming equal levels of internet usage, there is also the related problem that unpaid internet moderation naturally selects for narcissists. (And, really, it's the only way the system can work, since the only real currency of the internet is to make someone feel important within a community. It's the only reason sites like Wikipedia and SE can get thousands of hours of free labor from thousands of people.)
Re:Wikipedia Became the Last Good Place on the Internet
by cabalamat on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @11:19AM
(#38192582)
> Someone who is judicious about their upvotes is going to have a much smaller impact than some who just reflexively upvotes or downvotes everything based on kneejerk reactions.
It would be very easy for websites to weight upvotes so that one from someone who seldom uses them weighs more.
Re:Wikipedia Became the Last Good Place on the Internet
by lamontcg on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @11:43AM
(#38192970)
That probably incentivizes selling accounts to bot farms, usually in social media you give more weight to people who have stuck around longer rather than the accounts that have less activity and might be fake.
Re:Wikipedia Became the Last Good Place on the Internet
by extraduder_ire on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @02:32PM
(#38195719)
I think slashdot did something like that, but limited the amount of total votes you have per day. But that site's a little before my time. Would be nice if you could set the weights on voting yourself, along with other aspects of site moderation/ranking.
So of course anti-social nutcases dominate these spaces. That’s how these spaces are structured.