News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Real vs. fake AirPods with industrial CT by jacquesm on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @06:56PM (#38184869)
Anything that has the potential to release hot gas and flames under pressure into your ears is a safety risk.
Re:Real vs. fake AirPods with industrial CT by arghwhat on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @06:42AM (#38189095)
Sure, then don't use any earbuds that contain batteries.

We're dealing with tiny batteries in the 100mWh range here, which is less than 1/100th of phones famous for their... combustibility. Ejection of hot gas requires there to be quite a bit of energy present during the failure so that a certain extreme temperature can be reached. Below that, you'll just get a warm earbud.

> hot gas and flames

flames are hot gas

Re:Real vs. fake AirPods with industrial CT by jacquesm on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @08:30AM (#38190019)
That's where the brand comes in: they're supposed to have something to lose.

And yes, flames are hot gas, but not all hot gas is flames.

Re:Real vs. fake AirPods with industrial CT by arghwhat on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @09:33AM (#38190806)
> That's where the brand comes in: they're supposed to have something to lose.

Samsung is a huge brand, and had significant issues with battery fires. The bigger the brand, the less they lose because they swim in money and have specialists dedicated to PR damage control.

In fact, brands seem more likely to be the ones that manage to stuff more battery capacity in there, increasing risk and scope of damage.

Re:Real vs. fake AirPods with industrial CT by jacquesm on Wednesday November 08, 2023 @09:57AM (#38191247)
Yes, huge brands have problems, but they are at least incentivized to solve them, whereas some no-name company has no such incentive because they have absolutely nothing to lose. And suing Samsung for damages means you are at least sure there is something worth suing.
Re:Real vs. fake AirPods with industrial CT by arghwhat on Thursday November 09, 2023 @04:56AM (#38203033)
This is honestly so incredibly backwards:

The big companies cannot lose anything that matters to them, as they're too big and powerful, brushing off even the worst publicity. A small company collapses under pressure, and can be killed by even a viral meme going against them, with the owners suffering personal financial losses as a result.

Suing a big company like Samsung is an almost guaranteed loss with you thoroughly crushed and case precedent set so others have no reason to try. Suing a small company is a much more likely win, with reasonable damages.