Re:Judge Dismisses Copyright Claims Against AI Image Generators
by dragonwriter on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @12:06PM
(#38179473)
> You can argue that artists given an implicit license for people to copy art into their own brains while viewing it.
You can, but it would be more correct to argue that memories in a human brain are not copies under the law at all, and so need no license (or fair use analysis) in the first place. This has different results than an implicit license argument, especially when there is an explicit denial of license or an explicit license which is also explicitly bounded to exclude any rights not explicitly licensed.
You can, but it would be more correct to argue that memories in a human brain are not copies under the law at all, and so need no license (or fair use analysis) in the first place. This has different results than an implicit license argument, especially when there is an explicit denial of license or an explicit license which is also explicitly bounded to exclude any rights not explicitly licensed.