Re:Judge Dismisses Copyright Claims Against AI Image Generators
by gumballindie on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @11:30AM
(#38178864)
Let’s try something radical: not putting it any way.
A machine has no rights, and it doesnt learn as humans do.
I know the cult leader, altman, wants you to think otherwise, but no, stealing people’s work to make ai viable is not OK.
Re:Judge Dismisses Copyright Claims Against AI Image Generators
by dragonwriter on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @12:13PM
(#38179594)
Nah, Altman doesn't really want you think machines are like humans and have rights either, because if the law thought that, it would also think Altman was aspiring to be the greatest slaver in all of history.
Re:Judge Dismisses Copyright Claims Against AI Image Generators
by gumballindie on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @12:58PM
(#38180351)
> the greatest slaver
Once he manages to replace y'all with ai, what do you think you will become?
Put another way, if I create a Rube Goldberg painting machine, what copyright law applies? Why is that different than if I create/train/prompt an AI to do the work? One is physical, one is digital, but both require a human to create and initiate. And in both cases, every decision that human makes is made based on their life's experiences. No art exists in a vacuum. All art is derivative.