Re:Judge Dismisses Copyright Claims Against AI Image Generators
by BestGuess on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @09:33AM
(#38177174)
That doesn't make any sense to me as a line, as the human set up the machine to generate some way to generate images. The human still did "it", the "it" is just one step removed, and we've tons of things where some "it" is one step removed from the human where your line doesn't apply in law or people's concepts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge Dismisses Copyright Claims Against AI Image Generators
by ghaff on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @10:01AM
(#38177516)
Furthermore, but even if a human creates something directly, they've still "trained" on all sorts of things that include copyrighted images--and, yes, if they create something too close to one particular copyrighted image, they can be found to have infringed copyright.