News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by HHC-Hunter on Monday November 06, 2023 @09:25PM (#38172410)
I'd be interested if there's any weapon's systems engineers on here and what their thoughts are on their own morals when their creations are being used by people with even less morals.
Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by CamperBob2 on Monday November 06, 2023 @10:50PM (#38173025)
Valid question that shouldn't be downvoted, IMO. One answer is that as long as there are worse people doing worse things, it's not immoral to build and use whatever tools are needed to stop them.

Note the last few minutes in this very video, for instance.

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by Koshkin on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @10:20AM (#38177782)
> worse people doing worse things

Do not judge lest you be judged. (Matthew 7:1)

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by CamperBob2 on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @11:53AM (#38179224)
Even better, don't put yourself in a position where people are likely to judge your actions negatively.

For the most part, countries that don't invade their neighbors or commit atrocities have little to fear from the F-16.

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by CHB0403085482 on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @04:56AM (#38175062)
F-16 fly-by-wire system has a limiter

https://youtu.be/EhhOin2p5Qs?feature=shared&t=2101

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by extraduder_ire on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @05:41AM (#38175327)
Don't most fly-by-wire systems have such a limiter? (unless they have a specific mode where it's disabled, like the a320's alternate-law/direct-law systems)

No idea if there's toggle or breakable wire somewhere to let you exceed these design limits on this plane though.

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by Alifatisk on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @05:00AM (#38175086)
Wasn’t the F-35 the most complicated build?
Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by extraduder_ire on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @05:36AM (#38175296)
Yes. Brian also made a video about that plane (F-35B) earlier. They all have the title format "The Insane Engineering of.." Personally, I'm a big fan of the A-10 warthog video, and how it laid out the plane's main design goal: "how cheaply can we get a GAU-8 doing strafing runs over this 20km section of german airspace, where russian tanks may show up one day?"

The f-16 is more topical now, since it's more common, and is about to be deployed as a "cheap" plane to fight against russian planes. Like it was designed for in the first place.

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by 1letterunixname on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @07:23AM (#38175980)
Praise be to Viper engineers, drivers, mechanics, and mere admirers limited to the likes of Spectrum Holobyte and Thrustmaster.

Shame on to the F-35 "low" "replacement", my left foot, with an outsourced DoD and hydra-like MIC.

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by 1letterunixname on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @07:26AM (#38176011)
F-16 can be forced to stall, called a "deep stall". It's exited by toggling a certain AoA mode.

[pdf] https://www.falcon-bms.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FM_Dev...

Re:Insane Engineering of the F-16 by tekla on Tuesday November 07, 2023 @10:12AM (#38177670)
You can force anything to stall. Its easy (assuming something isn't actively preventing you)