If you can't get a conviction you don't have the right to ruin a life. Any deviation from this principle leads to mob rule.

> If you can't get a conviction

Just so we are on the same page. Here we "can't get a conviction" because the person resides in a country which doesn't care about the crime he committed. Not because the evidence does not pass the required evidentiary level.

> don't have the right to ruin a life.

Please explain to him how a life is ruined here?

> Any deviation from this principle leads to mob rule.

Where a mob is a single high profile individual with his reputation on the line, and this singular "mob" performed a through analysis and provides the full reasoning how he come to the conclusion. This "mob" rule does not look like the ones I usually hear about.

Wake me when there's some combination of Judge and jury. Without these things all you're offering is post facto rationalization.

So your official policy is to ban the fourth estate?

Last time I checked there were pretty strict laws governing what accusations the press can make and some fairly eyewatering financial consequences waiting when they overstep.

So you approve what Krebs is doing then, since he is not anonymous and identifiable to be sued for libel?

Nope. He's a private citizen. You can't just slap a "journalism" sticker wherever you feel like it.