1. The company is Estonian and regulated by the EU GDPR. Founders and all employees are the residents of the EU.
2. Was some stupid bug during the latest merge, already fixed, thanks a lot for finding this!
3.1. If we talk about the latency of cluster API, such a board is in our backlog atm. However, GitLab runners are clients by its nature, so it's hard to say what the API latency gives you here. Could you please elaborate?
3.2. The hardware is owned by GPU Computing OU and is placed in Tallinn, Estonia. We're working on adding US region as well.
I apologize if this comes across as overly intrusive, however the point is important given the current geopolitical context.
2. All good, happens to everyone!
3.1. I was referring to Customer <-> GitLab latency, we've seen a fair bit of time wasted on roundtrips :(
3.2. Noted. APAC?
3.1. We don't provide the GitLab hosting services, only runners + pipeline jobs. You can use self-hosted GitLab or GitLab.com with our service.
3.2. We have a few customers from this region currently, so if you're from APAC and you're interested in the service, please tell us more about your requirements:
1. Could you address concerns regarding the data exposure and privacy? According to the registry, company owners are:
Nikita Paushkin 38912300100 (Russian Federation) Direct ownership 25.01.2020
Ekaterina Marova 49003260123 Direct ownership 04.09.2021
2. Reading through the Customer Agreement, the list of banned countries includes Iceland... Why so?
3. Is there a looking glass to assess the latency? Who owns the hardware?