Re:The surprisingly subtle ways Microsoft Word has changed h...
by mcpackieh on Sunday November 05, 2023 @01:50PM
(#38154271)
There are international standards for representing dates, but none exist for names. Names do not abide by any scheme or set of rules, therefore the only appropriate data structure for storing names is a unicode string. Anything else will exclude people.
Re:The surprisingly subtle ways Microsoft Word has changed h...
by cratermoon on Sunday November 05, 2023 @04:37PM
(#38155905)
Point me to the international standards for representing money.
Re:The surprisingly subtle ways Microsoft Word has changed h...
by Shadowmist on Monday November 06, 2023 @01:14AM
(#38159442)
ISO 4217
Re:The surprisingly subtle ways Microsoft Word has changed h...
by cratermoon on Monday November 06, 2023 @01:06PM
(#38166212)
TIL
Re:The surprisingly subtle ways Microsoft Word has changed h...
by esafak on Sunday November 05, 2023 @07:31PM
(#38157335)
Without making assumptions about the origin of the name, you can't impute any structure onto that string, can you? In that case, it is still simply a string.
Re:The surprisingly subtle ways Microsoft Word has changed h...
by cratermoon on Thursday November 09, 2023 @05:08PM
(#38212064)
> making assumptions
We have i18n to give context, no assumptions needed.
To use another example, a binary tree is not an array, although it can be implemented using an array.
Money is not a floating point value, and woe to the programmer that tries to use float for money.