We got confused when researching StackStorm so to save you some digging : the software has been donated to the Linux foundation and is no longer supported by a commercial offering. See:

https://stackstorm.com/2020/05/27/extreme-networks-donates-e...

The website is out of date and still refers to the defunct enterprise offering

awesome, thanks.

so on the one hand, thats good as product will always be supported. But, will it get new updates without a company behind it?

Development is currently quite active. Everybody’s risk analysis is different, but my assessment is that :

- open source means that we can contribute the fixes and improvements we need - not being dependant on a commercial product protects us from events outside our control : what if the company goes under and does not release their code ? What about licensing / pricing changes ? - it follows that in the worse case scenario where the project is completely abandoned, we have the code base and opportunity of maintaining it - others are in the same position, which strengthens the incentive to collaborate on maintenance

That is not to say I’d systematically reject commercial products in favour of FOSS, just that both have different risk profiles that may or may not fit a given situation :)

It's supported by the opensource community under the neutral Linux Foundation governance: https://github.com/StackStorm/st2/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md