Re:AI and Open Source in 2023
by KRAKRISMOTT on Sunday November 05, 2023 @12:36PM
(#38153372)
Yes, I think most of the misunderstanding comes from people who are not in ML. A lot of the times you can't release the training pipeline without getting into grey areas of training data copyright. A ML model is a high dimensional distribution that can be sampled from infinitely, given enough time and money you can train another model (possibly even with a different architecture) that closely models the original model in generation capability.
I've actually argued the opposite. https://www.marble.onl/posts/considerations_for_copyrighting... When you look at the freedoms underlying open source, you can exercise them without the training data.
Most of what disqualifies the licenses I mentioned above from being classically open source is use restrictions.