Words mean different things for different people and in different contexts. That there is only one universally correct meaning is true in Python, but just not how human language works.

Pretty sure what I wrote was understandable for most. You probably also understood it, but felt the need to complain about the vocabulary.

Actually, very much no. I see no connection whatsoever between, on the one hand, division of labor & exchange of labor for money and, on the other hand, capitalism.

The first two may be a necessary precondition for capitalism, but they in no way describe it - they are common elements in human communities that predate capitalism by millenia.