News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Toward a TypeScript for C++" by bigfudge on Saturday November 04, 2023 @10:52AM (#38141540)
I’m not sure how people are supposed to do that in the browser. This feels like an excessively dismissive comment.
Re:Toward a TypeScript for C++" by mgaunard on Saturday November 04, 2023 @12:07PM (#38142322)
Have you not heard of WebAssembly?
Re:Toward a TypeScript for C++" by kangalioo on Sunday November 05, 2023 @04:17AM (#38149534)
WebAssembly is not without tradeoffs either. I'm not an expert, but it's often heavier due to bundling the native language's stdlib; it's annoying to interop with the browser environment because that's still JavaScript-tailored; it's also just hard to write code that can be compiled into WASM (e.g. in Rust, it needs to be `#[no_std]`)
Re:Toward a TypeScript for C++" by mgaunard on Sunday November 05, 2023 @08:38AM (#38151014)
If you're doing real work, you don't interact with the browser.

If you're just glueing things together between APIs, then JavaScript is fine, and static typing would just get in the way.