Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by lll-o-lll on Friday November 03, 2023 @10:17PM (#38137473)

I think, to understand her concerns, you would need to be in the field. I’m pretty smart, and I have plenty of layman knowledge, but I’m completely lost once she gets technical.

The summary of the issue, as I understand it, is as follows.

The modifications do much more than we realised, and the impacts are poorly tested. That’s the gist. It’s enough for me to go “there could be dragons here”, but I honestly haven’t bothered to try and change any purchasing decisions. I think the horse has already bolted anyway. Doesn’t the gmo end up in pretty much everything regardless?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by dade_ on Friday November 03, 2023 @10:27PM (#38137546)

our understanding of DNA is pretty basic. I’d say we’re using a hatchet to do surgery.

Did she make any reference to studies?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by lll-o-lll on Friday November 03, 2023 @10:31PM (#38137567)

Yes, but I’m texting her to get info. I’ll update here, but it’ll probably take a while. Probably shouldn’t have said anything, but I was hopeful that there might be another plant molecular biologist in the audience who could clear things up.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by rawgabbit on Friday November 03, 2023 @10:41PM (#38137631)

[delayed]

[ Parent | on HN ]