News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by dade_ on Friday November 03, 2023 @09:08PM (#38137051)
So you are saying glycophosphates are super duper healthy for humans and everything in the river and ocean. Awesome, where is that data?

Also, Hersheys is loaded with lead and cadmium, which is probably bad for anything living.

https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-safety/lead-and-...

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by XorNot on Friday November 03, 2023 @09:29PM (#38137184)
Whether something kills humans, and whether it kills fish are two entirely different questions. For example: the medium fish live in has a 100% kill rate on humans submerged in it for longer then about 5 minutes.
Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by dgroshev on Friday November 03, 2023 @09:13PM (#38137085)
No, I'm not saying that, how can you read my reply that way in good faith?

I didn't say anything about Hersheys either.

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by dade_ on Friday November 03, 2023 @09:19PM (#38137122)
Chemophobia - it annoys me that people think that the only harm we must consider for herbicides and pesticides is humans, then proceeded to dump billions of gallons of this, which ultimately end up down rivers, lakes, and oceans. there are countless creatures being affected by the chemicals, but somehow we skip that study.

You brought up chocolate. Hersheys arguably is chocolate and the Consumer Reports study is actually about dark chocolate, and all the amazing chemicals in it.

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by dgroshev on Friday November 03, 2023 @09:36PM (#38137231)
Who are those people? Regulators look at harm to other animals as well, and the fate of the herbicide is one of the most important considerations. Glyphosate in particular effectively binds to soil [1] and is biodegraded there by various bacteria fairly rapidly.

The fact that you are talking about "chemicals" in this generic way is what makes it chemophobia. There can be no serious point in talking about "chemicals" that can't even be defined, it's always irrational.

[1] https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsbdev2_02581...

Re:Bayer hit with $332M judgement in Roundup cancer trial by dade_ on Friday November 03, 2023 @10:12PM (#38137442)
I don’t have a fear of chemicals. Everything is a chemical, but I’ve met the people you are describing, I promise to never use the work again.

Keep in mind these studies are from 1997, the world wasn’t even ruined by the Internet at that point. The studies about humans described in your link are: some idiot drank half a cup of it, and he didn’t die, and the rabbits and mice seem ok. It’s safe! I just struggle, because even at that time these types of anecdotal statements were so dubious. It’s now over 25 years later, so what are the long-term effect?

As a point of comparison, Johnson and Johnson continues to insist that their asbestos laced baby powder doesn’t cause cancer (contradicting reality), so Monsanto now Bayer assurances don’t generate much confidence for me.