Proxima Fusion looks to take stellarators commercial

Re:Proxima Fusion looks to take stellarators commercial by Symmetry on Friday November 03, 2023 @01:28PM (#38132048)

And the Navy puts money into fusion research for that reason, including a bit into cold fusion just in case. But that's not what their doing at NIF, those guys are trying to figure out if you can make a thermonuclear bomb with just cheap lithium deutride and not the expensive plutonium/enriched uranium.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Proxima Fusion looks to take stellarators commercial by tivert on Friday November 03, 2023 @03:37PM (#38133947)

> But that's not what their doing at NIF, those guys are trying to figure out if you can make a thermonuclear bomb with just cheap lithium deutride and not the expensive plutonium/enriched uranium.

IIRC, thermonuclear bombs are already made with lithium deutride.

Do you mean they're trying to build a thermonuclear bomb without the fission "detonator"? That doesn't make tons of sense to me, since I'd think the test ban treaty would realistically prevent creation of novel types of weapons (because it wouldn't be foolish to rely on a weapon for deterrence that you've never fully tested).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Proxima Fusion looks to take stellarators commercial by actionfromafar on Friday November 03, 2023 @05:51PM (#38135457)

The treaty Russia just punted on?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Proxima Fusion looks to take stellarators commercial by danbruc on Friday November 03, 2023 @06:39PM (#38136003)

The one that the United States signed but never ratified? Just as China, Egypt, Iran and Israel. And that India, North Korea and Pakistan never signed to begin with? And that will enter into force only after all those countries have signed at ratified it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Proxima Fusion looks to take stellarators commercial by actionfromafar on Saturday November 04, 2023 @06:37AM (#38139740)

Exactly. We shouldn’t be extremely surprised if testing resumes.

[ Parent | on HN ]