News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty on all charges by matheusmoreira on Thursday November 02, 2023 @08:32PM (#38122604)
> There’s a big difference between that and SVB.

Not to me. All I see is corporations that accept money, do god knows what with them and cause the money to evaporate into thin air. It doesn't really matter how much the government "approves" of the reserves and investments of banks. They're still all the same: literally one bank run away from insolvency.

Re:Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty on all charges by eropple on Thursday November 02, 2023 @08:51PM (#38122841)
A: "We submit to capital controls and while extremely infrequently our investment groups make (occasionally disastrous) mistakes, the system of human finance is arguably more stable than at any point in the history of our species' efforts to trade with people beyond the horizon."

B: "We bought a house for the founder's parents while they advised ways to hide it and threw millions of dollars at the insolvent-by-design crypto fund of somebody in the boss's polycule."

You: "No difference detected."

For real?

Re:Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty on all charges by matheusmoreira on Thursday November 02, 2023 @09:35PM (#38123233)
Yeah, for real.

A: "We take customer money and risk it."

B: "We take customer money and risk it."

Just because one puts the money into "safe" investments does not make them any different. It's still a bank doing fractional reserve banking.

Re:Sam Bankman-Fried found guilty on all charges by vineyardmike on Friday November 03, 2023 @01:51PM (#38132392)
FTX: Ee stole money. We lied. We gave it to friends to gamble. Illegally.

SVB: our shitty compliance department bought bonds (a government requirement) with too long of a maturity date to sell in a bank run.

One is incompetent and the other is malicious.

Also fractional banking is literally required by law.