News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness. Parent comment

Re:Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness by flockonus on Thursday November 02, 2023 @04:34PM (#38119742)
While i don't disagree, that's missing the forest for the trees - the point is having the freedom to share models and continue to open-source.

I'll argue that between stable diffusion and llama 2, there is nothing highly specific that prevents [very] large amount of people from adopting these models and specializing for them own needs.

The tragedy would be if those went away.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness by shrimpx on Thursday November 02, 2023 @05:35PM (#38120526)
Yeah but llama2-level AI may be insignificant in power compared to future models, which may be inaccessible to the public. Even assuming the algorithms/code are open, people at large won't be able to create working models.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Joint Statement on AI Safety and Openness by flockonus on Friday November 03, 2023 @02:51PM (#38133227)
Not sure at all, when you look at amount of opensource being done in regards to quantization. One of many examples: https://huggingface.co/TheBloke/Llama-2-7B-GGML
[ Parent | on HN ]