Re:History of Philosophy without any gaps
by FranzFerdiNaN on Wednesday November 01, 2023 @03:39AM
(#38095537)
It’s also over fifty years old and history as a science has developed a lot since then.
The books can be considered primary sources by now, as examples of history writing in the 1920s to the 1960s. I wouldn’t bother reading them to learn about the past anymore though.
The books can be considered primary sources by now, as examples of history writing in the 1920s to the 1960s. I wouldn’t bother reading them to learn about the past anymore though.