Re:Engineers develop a 96% efficient process to make formate...
by nomel on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @06:12PM
(#38092144)
This seems like far in the future, where the direct use of the nuclear wouldn't prevent more CO2 from being introduced into the atmosphere, than could be removed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Engineers develop a 96% efficient process to make formate...
by skaushik92 on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @06:39PM
(#38092348)
Also, it could be wherever nuclear wouldn’t be permissible otherwise (e.g floating in the middle of the Pacific Ocean extracting CO2 from the atmosphere, away from populations that don’t want it nearby)
Re:Engineers develop a 96% efficient process to make formate...
by cogman10 on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @06:44PM
(#38092402)
Yup, said another way, this would only really make sense if we are producing more energy than we can reasonably use and need to sink it somewhere.
However, there are so many sinks for energy that I just doubt CO2 will be a priority any time soon. Desalination, for example, will almost certainly end up being a huge energy sink as the world gets hotter.
Re:Engineers develop a 96% efficient process to make formate...
by frankus on Tuesday October 31, 2023 @08:17PM
(#38093109)
I have to wonder if at some point rich eccentrics will start installing CO2 scrubbers in their houses to bring the indoor concentration below 400 ppm.